Evaluation of cotton fibers stickiness by colorimetric method

Journal: Vol.6, No.1, Winter 2013 - Article 2   Pages :   Until 

Article Code:

Ali Shams nateri: University of Guilan - Textile Engineering Department
M. Mohajerani: University of Tarbiat moallem - Department of Textile Engineering

Article's abstract:

Stickiness is the physical process of contaminated lint adhering to equipment. The degree of stickiness depends on chemical identity, quantity, and distribution of the sugars. The sugar in cotton fibers may be insect or plant derived. There are several methods for measuring cotton fibers stickiness. In this work, a colorimetric method was used for the measurements. In the method, honeydew was caramelized by heating cotton fibers, which caused the color of the honeydew to change from pale/colorless to yellow and brown. Heating did not cause any discoloration or change in cotton fibers. Then the yellow index b was used for determining the cotton fibers stickiness. There are high correlation and agreement between results of colorimetric, thermodetector and sugar content method. The colorimetric method is a semi-quantitative and high speed method.

Cotton, Honeydew, Colorimetry, Stickiness, Yellowness

1. D. E. Brushwood, H. H. Perkins, Cotton sugar and stickiness test methods, Can. Text. J., 110(1993), 54-62.#2. G. Gamble, The thermo chemical degradation of melezitose and trehalulose as related to cotton stickiness, Text. Res. J., 72(2002), 174-177 .#3. B. Z. Heuer, A new approach to reduce sugar content of cotton fibers and its consequence for fiber stickiness, Text. Res. J., 55(1985), 263-266.#4. R. H. Balasubramanya, S. P. Bhatawdekar, K. M. Paraliker, a new method for reducing the stickiness of cotton, Text. Res. J., 55(1985), 227-232.#5. O. Fonteneau-Tamime, R. Frydrych, J. Y. Drean, carded spinning of sticky cotton part A: stickiness effects on productivity, Text. Res. J., 71(2001), 1023-1030.#6. O. Fonteneau-Tamime, R. Frydrych, J. Y. Drean, carded spinning of sticky cotton part A: stickiness effects on quality, Text. Res. J., 71(2001), 1046-1052.#7. H. Henry, J. R. Perkins, Identification and processing of honeydew-contaminated cottons, Text. Res. J., 53(1983), 508-512.#8. E. Hequet, N. Abidi, Processing sticky cotton, http://www. geocities.com/ vijayakumar777/ process ingstickycotton.html., Accessed online 2004.#9. The university of Arizina, Cotton stickiness, http:// www.geocities.com/vijayakumar777/cottonstickiness.html., Accessed online 2004.#10. O. Elsner, Detecting sugars in cotton lint, Text. Res. J., 52(1982), 538-539.#11. E. Hequet, T. J. Henneberry, R. L. Nichols, 2007, Sticky cotton: causes, effects, and prevention, Technical Bulletin No. 1915.Agricultural Research Service, (2007).#12. N. M. Gary, Modern concepts of color and appearance, Science Publishers Inc., U.S.A., 2000.#13. A. Shams-Nateri, The effects of illuminants and standard observers combination on relationship between spectrophoto metric error and colorimetric inaccuracy, Prog. Color Colorants Coat., 4(2011), 59-69.#14. T. M. Robert, Colorimetry, datacolor International, CRC Press LLC, 1999.#15. R. G. Gary, Mitigation of Whitefly Honeydew Levels on Cotton Lint via Thermal and Citric Acid Treatment, J. Cotton Sci., 6(2002),143-147.

Article's file
Page view: 2768
Article's download quantity : 631

Article System Login

Prof. Zahra Ranjbar
Dr. Farahnaz Nourmohammadian
Assistant Editor:
Dr. Mozhgan Hosseinnezhad
ISSN (online):
Institute for Color Science and Technology (ICST)

Quick Access
What is your opinion about the manuscript subscription system of PCCC website?
Website Statistics
Page view:2,769
Online Visitors:62